CFM a cult? Say what??

It must also be
known that the Potter's House church has been a victim of much internet slander.
Yet the Potter's House hate group "Slam the Door" has been exposed as a bunch of
frauds!
See these links:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/slamthedoor_frauds/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pottershousechurchcfm/
They were
only about 10 people all up, but claimed to be 100's. These liars and deceivers
have shown that they can not be trusted. They even ran a yahoo group claiming to
be Potter's House Christians and behaved obnoxiously so that people would think
that regular PH people were like that. When the groups IPs were
exposed, they shut it down, because they had been TALKING TO THEMSELVES, i.e.
pretending to be dozens of people, both for and against the PH but were only ONE
PERSON! Most of the people involved have not shown any signs of disgust ( in the
fact that some anti Potter's House people were also "duped" to believe that the
people in the Yahoo chat room were real, i.e. 100's of different people not the
same few people) and they continue to post with those deceivers on some new
group they have formed, run by an agnostic.
I think that if someone is
going to make accusations about the Church then they should look through these
links to see the other side of the story! Ken Haining who runs most of the anti
Potter's House sites has claimed that I have left the church and that I am now a
homosexual. Neil Taylor pretended to be my ex girlfriend on a group,
and said that I had homosexual desire towards a former leader in the church. The
really weird thing is that the former leader who they said I was attracted to
was Neil Taylor who was pretending to be my ex! Weird. I have exposed them as
frauds and now instead of CFM being the target of slander, I am copping it. But
I don't care, it just proves to me and all who know me that they are liars who
will do anything to defame CFM.
None of the anti Potter House people who
frequent Ken Haining's groups seem to be worried about that type of slander but
continue to believe Ken Haining and his anti Potter's House articles. If they
make up such slander about me, what else are they lying about. They are not
interested in the truth but try to sensationalize any gossip or slander made
against the church. Many times they make up stories about good decent people
saying that many ministers have prostitutes and steal the churches money. Being
a victim of their slander myself, I can see how they simply lie to make CFM look
evil. They also post on almost every internet forum where the Potter's
House is mentioned to smear the people there. I have been part of the Potter's
House for 11 years and have never seen anything that they describe in their hate
groups. My pastor is a great man who loves people and never manipulates or
controls. I also study cults and frequently listen to Dave Hunt, Joseph
Chambers, Jacob Parach, Phillip Powell, and other discernment ministers, and
find CFM as healthy church when compared to the current church trends exposed by
those men.
"All who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will
suffer persecution."
Also much on Ross' site is just news clips
but Rick has a particular hatred towards Pentecostal Christians. Rick is a self
confessed Homosexual, who hates Jesus and the Church. If the Salvation Army were
as zealous as they were 100 years ago he would list them. He loves dead
Christianity, but hates the type that converts people and says that Jesus is the
only way. This hatred stems from when someone tried to convert his Jewish
grandmother. His hatred to Christ is evident in who he attacks.
http://www.rrexposed.u2k.biz/
http://www.cultawarenessnetwork.org/dbase/bios/rross.html
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/130-rick-ross
http://www.pottersclub.com/articleshow.asp?art_num=8
http://www.forumsau.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=18
Rick Ross has a one
sided bias
Rick Ross does not
trust any information stemming from CFM leadership or current members. He
believes that the only reliable information comes from former CFM members and
secular news reports. He sees all current members who attend the Potter’s
House
Church
as brainwashed and in need of his deprogramming.
Although one would
conclude that a former member would have something important to say, it must be
remembered that to have a logical balanced view, one must openly look at both
sides. For example, an ex member may say to Ross that the Potter’s House is a
cult etc, but the pastor and congregation may have another side to the story
that brings a neutral point of view or perhaps a negative view upon that person.
For example if the pastor knew that a certain member had
committed adultery and was asked to leave the congregation for 6 months, but the
person failed to tell Ross of the moral failure and the true reason they were
removed from the church, that should bring a nullification of that persons
report. If a person in this situation said to Ross that they were made to feel
bad, felt controlled, were shunned by other church members etc… she may not
actually be lying per se, but when the other side of the coin is revealed, you
can then sympathize with why the pastor or church would have removed such a
person. The problem is with Ross is that he only tells half of the story, or
should I say, he only has the bad news on his site, but never puts any counter
arguments. A truth seeking reporter would want to know the full story not just
sensationalized media which tells half the story. I conclude that Ross is biased
in his reporting of the Potter's House. This must be taken into consideration
when looking at anything parroted by Ross on his site.
Also Ross uses anonymous sources! Any Joe can write
to Ross and proclaim that they too have been abused, hurt, shunned, etc, by the
Church. When they holiday in Florida,
they can write a letter to Ross saying the same things over again to solidify
Ross' suspicions that these are common claims. The demise of the Slam the
Door group has shown to the world that there are at least 5 people who do
this on the internet on a daily basis. Because of this, one would conclude that
before the net was available, these people did the same via mail and anonymous
phone calls. If a person had a full name a contact email or number, then there
would be some credibility to that. But there have been people like Ken Haining
and Neil Taylor, who have had dozens of aliases and still to this day run
internet sites that are linked to by Ross.
Ross parrots any drivel coming his way about CFM. Why?
Because it is profitable for Rick to claim that CFM is a cult. The more people
who think CFM is a cult, the more profitable his anti cult business. The more
hits on his website and the more people who need his deprogramming at thousands of dollars a pop!
Rick Ross’ articles
generalize inappropriately
Rick Ross’ articles
generalize inappropriately, lumping together the Potter’s House with dangerous
groups, such as the Peoples
Temple
,
Ku Klux Klan, Waco
,
and Heavens Gate cults.
To label the
Potter’s House a cult in such a broad way is inaccurate. In CFM being highly
evangelistic and outspoken, it is certain that it will attract negative
feedback. To conclude that CFM is cultic because of this and name CFM amongst
groups like the above mentioned is not good research. Yes CFM practices some
unconventional methods such as street preaching, street dramas, haunted house
drama scenes, etc, but in no way do these make CFM cultic. The Salvation Army
used unconventional methods in evangelism but in retrospect are seen by most
Christians as heroes and revolutionaries. Conceivably Mitchell is like a modern
day William Booth who stirs the pot, but does not deserve to be listed with such
derogatory cult titles by Ross. If you study the lives of Luther, Wycliffe,
Tyndale, Booth, Finney, Wesley, etc, you will see a common thread of accusation
and exaggeration of claims by critics.
Witch Hunt
Rick Ross’ articles create a moral panic and witch hunt
through their exaggeration of the harm and dangers of The Potter’s
House.
The articles are over
sensationalized. By using words and statements like, cult, shunned,
authoritarian leadership, brainwashed, trapped, controlling, mind control, abuse
etc. But these words need to be correctly defined. If I used these terms about a
football club with a coach who was keen to see his team win, I could say he has
“authoritarian leadership” and that he “brainwashed” his players to give more
than is expected, he was “controlling” the kids who just wanted to have fun etc.
My point is that when someone has a
bias, they word things with a negative slant. In this way the general definition
of a word is somewhat distorted from the words true meaning in context, thus
making it mean anything from being raped to being told off. Take the word
“abuse.” It can have such a broad definition. Usually people think of sexual or
physical abuse, but the “abuse” Ross’ articles mention also include things like
- the pastor not openly displaying a sense of love and warmness, or members of a
congregation gossiping or speaking about someone.
The thing is, people read Ross’ site and see the word
“abused” amongst the Jonestown articles, Skinhead articles, etc, but then see
the same terminology in the Potter’s House articles, when in reality the
accusations are no where near like these other cult groups. It is hype to do so.
It is also a form of dishonesty. If I claimed that “all the children in that
class were abused by their teacher,” referring to sexual abuse, but then said
the same thing talking of how the teacher raised his voice in class, there is a
world of difference. Ross knows that there is a difference and should define his
words better. Or chose better articles to parrot that are not just
sensationalized rubbish.
You would
think if Ross was interested in the truth about an organization he would
interview people who are in it. If Ross ever wants to talk with me or do an
interview about CFM I would be thrilled to do so. If I wanted to know what a
J.W. thought or taught, I would ask members straight out because sometimes cult
books have things like sales agendas which can influence the content, and also
because one is a “cult expert” doesn’t necessarily make them also a bible
expert. I believe that most misconceptions about the Potter’s House is because
there is not much information about it, i.e. what is really preached and taught,
and practiced in CFM, unless you attend a CFM church. Most info about CFM is
from Ross who parrots and magnifies the testimonies of “ex members” some of whom
have been proven guilty of having many other aliases to project the numbers of
angry “ex-members.” This creates a dilemma. Ross won’t let CFM have a say, on
his site, but then has only negative articles. In doing so he brings an
unbalanced view. I tell people if they want to know about CFM just listen to the
audio sermons and meet with some members. In doing so you will find that 99% of
what Ross claims is biased one sided trash media. It is like trying to make a
judgment about black people when all you read is Ku Klux Klan articles. Go and
mingle with them, talk to them, and see what is really being said and done.
The real witch hunt should be aimed at
the Slam the Door people who have been proven frauds and openly admit to
it. If Ross is a man who is concerned with the truth, he should do an
investigation to see how they have lied and manipulated people. He should also
take their links from off his site. These people behave 100 times worse than
Ross' articles claim CFM does.
It is not the
behavior of pastors nor of individual experience that would cause a person to
hate the fellowship, but association with backsliders and heretics, and
adherence to the anti Potter's House indoctrination on the internet and other
media sources.
Brainwashed?
The amazing thing is that the anti Potter's House groups
claim that someone like me is brainwashed, and also a brainwasher. And yet most
of the greatest brainwashing experiments supported by millions of dollars in
funding, and also countless experiments, have all been
unsuccessful.
The CIA used drugs and
electroshock during their investigations into mind-control and MKultra, but most
of their experiments were failures as they failed to produce even one potential
Manchurian Candidate, and the program was finally abandoned.
The brainwashing attempts by Communist military
organizations during the Korean war also failed. They were forced to use torture
to supplement their mind-control techniques and were able to obtain success in
only a few cases. However, the Slam the Door rebels strangely believe that the
preaching and activity within the Potter's House represents some sort of major
advance over those earlier "primitive" brainwashing techniques. It makes me
wonder how they can answer the question that CFM leaders, who are relatively
uneducated in any type of manipulation program let alone brainwashing
techniques, could succeed when highly trained experts had earlier failed, who
had their whole focus on brainwashing.
The Slam the Door people make out as if we all sit in the pew
in our church and our eyes all of a sudden start spiraling like the old
cartoons, and then BANG! You’re hypnotized. There is about as much control in
CFM as in any organization like your job, or a football club, or any other
committed church. In the church people come and go as they please; only those
who allow the pastor to instruct them are "told" what to do. Imagine if a coach
said "I want you to do 4 laps today" and people ran off crying about abuse and
control. That is how silly most of the accusations are against CFM. Anyone can
leave at any time. I could leave tomorrow if I wanted too! But I love the church
and the people there, so I choose not to.
Many of the internet sites made by these people reveal that
it is not by attending CFM or notbelieving
in what CFM teaches that will cause people to end up slandering the fellowship,
but rather association with heretics and backsliders who are already doing that.
Most people didn't begin to hate the church until they were told the "truth"
(quote, unquote) about the church by someone who knew all the conspiracy
theories about it.
The hatred of CFM is
not a natural response, it is a learned one. Ken Haining is in front of the
class teaching others with his message "hate CFM at ALL
costs."
The bitterness of a few can
defile many, and there are some very bitter and spiteful people in
their groups, as their slander of good people in CFM, including myself,
concludes.
Pray that the lies and the
liars become exposed. Pray also for their salvation. Jesus said to pray for and
to love our enemies.
Always remember that
Jesus said in Luke 6:26: Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for
so did their fathers to the false prophets. The conclusion is that Pastor
Mitchell and the fellowship is suffering persecution because true believers
always do! - 2 Tim 3:12 Yea, and all that
will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. Pray on these
things.
Home | An Open Door | Healing
Book | Blueprint From
Heaven | Amazing Testimonies | Critics
of the Potter's House | Links | Webmaster | Contact | Audio
Sermons | Disclaimer
You can become a Christian today